Stigma research in the field of intellectual disabilities: A scoping review on the perspective of care providers

Individual Author(s) / Organizational Author
Pelleboer-Gunnink, Hannah A.
van Oorsouw, Wietske M. W. J.
van Weeghel, Jaap
Embregts, Petri J. C. M.
Publisher
Taylor & Francis Group
Date
July 2019
Publication
International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
Abstract / Description

Care providers are key agents in the lives of individuals with an intellectual disability (ID). The quality of their support can be affected by manifestations of stigma. This scoping review was conducted to explore studies that provide indications of care providers’ stigmatization of people with ID. Methods: A structured search was made in four databases to identify relevant studies in English-language peer-reviewed journals. Records were systematically and independently screened by the researchers. Results: The 40 articles included in this review were mainly conducted in Western countries and used Likert-type self-report measures of explicit attitudes. Stigmatization seemed more distinct concerning people with high support needs. The few studies on public stigma preliminary suggest that staff may also stigmatize people with ID based on other social identities. Regarding the support of structural stigma, staff reported skepticism regarding community inclusion for people with high support needs, and tended to be ambivalent about the protection-or-empowerment balance in the support of people with ID. Possible indications of stigmatization regarding sexuality were found on specific issues, such as self-determination and privacy. Agreement of staff with certain rights did not necessarily lead to staff acting in accordance with such rights. Conclusion: Indications of stigmatization of people with ID by care providers were found. Stigmatizing attitudes might affect the quality of care providers’ support. Potential leads for future interventions concern creating awareness, sharing power, addressing diagnostic overshadowing, and providing explicit policy translations. Directions for future research concern strengthening the methodology of studies and enriching the studied topics. (author abstract) #P4HEwebinarJuly2024

Artifact Type
Research
Reference Type
Journal Article
Priority Population
People with disabilities
P4HE Authored
No
Topic Area
Social/Structural Determinants » Isms and Phobias